AVnut
Apr 28, 08:24 PM
As an experiment I downloaded Angry Birds Rio HD to my iTunes account and copied it to the shared user folder.
I logged out of my user account (not iTunes) on my Mac and logged in as my wife. I dropped the .ipa file into her iTunes account and the app synced and works fine.
I never had to be logged into iTunes with my login at all to get the app transfered.
Thoughts on how this is possible? To easy?
I logged out of my user account (not iTunes) on my Mac and logged in as my wife. I dropped the .ipa file into her iTunes account and the app synced and works fine.
I never had to be logged into iTunes with my login at all to get the app transfered.
Thoughts on how this is possible? To easy?
shawnce
Oct 24, 05:09 PM
i suspect we'll see leopard released in january.
I hope you are wrong :)
I want Apple to take the time that is needed to clean and update their APIs as best they can... the 64 bit API switch is their best chance and only near term chance to clean house.
I hope you are wrong :)
I want Apple to take the time that is needed to clean and update their APIs as best they can... the 64 bit API switch is their best chance and only near term chance to clean house.
Patmian212
Nov 30, 04:14 PM
How much and what comes with it, I dont know if I am interested, this is just a feeler.
ViciousShadow21
Nov 8, 08:29 PM
mine for November
dsyntax
Sep 11, 10:59 AM
Like a bunch of the posters already, I was in the second period of the day in my High School. The headmaster came into my class and asked us to gather in the chapel with the rest of the school. I have to admit, my first reaction before I knew anything about the trajedy was, "Sweet, no more Latin today."
It was pretty scary actually since my school was about 100 yards from the National Cathedral in Washington DC and there was some concern among the administrators that it might be a target. I ended up walking the three miles home with my mom who had to walk the whole way home from her work since the city was basically shut down.
I remember in the weeks after that every plane I saw descending toward National Airport looked like it was coming in too fast and too low to be normal.
It was pretty scary actually since my school was about 100 yards from the National Cathedral in Washington DC and there was some concern among the administrators that it might be a target. I ended up walking the three miles home with my mom who had to walk the whole way home from her work since the city was basically shut down.
I remember in the weeks after that every plane I saw descending toward National Airport looked like it was coming in too fast and too low to be normal.
Claude626
Nov 11, 10:58 AM
Hello MacRumors,
I'm very surprised that you had removed(or was it never there?) the breadcrumbs at the bottom of any forum page. I find this very counter intuitive.
By the time the user reach the bottom of a long thread page, I think the most common actions would be to either want to move to a different page of the same thread or to go back to the section page with listings of all the thread titles. In my case, I ALWAYS want to go back to the section page so I can select another thread to view. Currently... there is no breadcrumb at the bottom that I can quickly jump back out of the thread.
There's always the back button on the browser... However, that's practical only if the thread is single page(or I can even stand 2-3 pages, just a few more back clicks, right?). What if I've dwelved a good 10 or so pages into a long thread? Or I'm jumping around a REALLY long thread to try to find something? I would have to scroll all the way up just to find the breadcrumb at the top. Very annoying...
It may seem like a trivial thing and I'm nit picky... but imagine that this repeated annoyance happens nearly every time you view a multi-page thread... I realize that there is the "Forum Jump" menu, but that either requires 2 clicks or you must scroll... Why can't we have both? Jumping else where with "Forum Jump" or simply single click to jump back up a tree.
Also on a side note... your breadcrumb at the top of the forum page is broken in FireFox. The "trigger box" for the "MacRumors Forums" link is a huge box that overlays the next few items in the breadcrumb. Essentially, making the neighboring links useless because it would fire the "MacRumors Forums" link instead.
Please bring back the bottom breadcrumb... It's the most logical place to offer navigational links since the user is most likely done with reading and would like to browse else where.
Please fix the top breadcrumb when viewed in FireFox...
Thanks!
I'm very surprised that you had removed(or was it never there?) the breadcrumbs at the bottom of any forum page. I find this very counter intuitive.
By the time the user reach the bottom of a long thread page, I think the most common actions would be to either want to move to a different page of the same thread or to go back to the section page with listings of all the thread titles. In my case, I ALWAYS want to go back to the section page so I can select another thread to view. Currently... there is no breadcrumb at the bottom that I can quickly jump back out of the thread.
There's always the back button on the browser... However, that's practical only if the thread is single page(or I can even stand 2-3 pages, just a few more back clicks, right?). What if I've dwelved a good 10 or so pages into a long thread? Or I'm jumping around a REALLY long thread to try to find something? I would have to scroll all the way up just to find the breadcrumb at the top. Very annoying...
It may seem like a trivial thing and I'm nit picky... but imagine that this repeated annoyance happens nearly every time you view a multi-page thread... I realize that there is the "Forum Jump" menu, but that either requires 2 clicks or you must scroll... Why can't we have both? Jumping else where with "Forum Jump" or simply single click to jump back up a tree.
Also on a side note... your breadcrumb at the top of the forum page is broken in FireFox. The "trigger box" for the "MacRumors Forums" link is a huge box that overlays the next few items in the breadcrumb. Essentially, making the neighboring links useless because it would fire the "MacRumors Forums" link instead.
Please bring back the bottom breadcrumb... It's the most logical place to offer navigational links since the user is most likely done with reading and would like to browse else where.
Please fix the top breadcrumb when viewed in FireFox...
Thanks!
Deepdale
Sep 28, 05:18 PM
Who here saw "Commander in Chief"? ... Any thoughts?
Just finished watching it on tape and enjoyed it very much. I was hoping it would be decent and it more than surpassed my expectations. Fine performances, good storylines and not the least bit boring giving the political nature of the show.
Now there is something entertaining and engrossing to follow "The Biggest Loser" on Monday evening ... this one may actually prove to be a bonafide winner.
Just finished watching it on tape and enjoyed it very much. I was hoping it would be decent and it more than surpassed my expectations. Fine performances, good storylines and not the least bit boring giving the political nature of the show.
Now there is something entertaining and engrossing to follow "The Biggest Loser" on Monday evening ... this one may actually prove to be a bonafide winner.
lexus
Jan 5, 04:03 PM
I cannot wait!!
bluarash
Aug 7, 06:21 PM
Yes, Parallels and VMware are better products, but that is not the point. Has no one else noticed the number of products Microsoft is canceling for the Mac. I do not believe that Microsoft sees a market for the Macintosh. This of course is purely a business perspective.
I for one think Apple will be taught a lesson in respect. The only logical solution is to kill off Mac Office universal binary support. If they want to run on the Intel platform, they can run on emulation.
It would not be much of a loss if Microsoft decided to pull the plug. Don't think they haven't taught about it. A three percent market share or 19 million desktop users does not even come close to the numbers that still use Windows 2000, never mind Windows 98. I of course don't wish this to happen, but it is one logical outcome.
I for one think Apple will be taught a lesson in respect. The only logical solution is to kill off Mac Office universal binary support. If they want to run on the Intel platform, they can run on emulation.
It would not be much of a loss if Microsoft decided to pull the plug. Don't think they haven't taught about it. A three percent market share or 19 million desktop users does not even come close to the numbers that still use Windows 2000, never mind Windows 98. I of course don't wish this to happen, but it is one logical outcome.
Pigumon
Oct 31, 05:45 PM
The main reason I hate this idea is, I have a 3G iPod, which is easily apple's most poorly designed ipod.
You can FEEL for the buttons to skip or pause or whatever. Once you touch, you've already skipped to the next song. Having to contantly put on the lock button is very annoying.
To imagine just holding this and accidently activating a million options...
I can hope this is either a decoy, or that somehow apple has figured out something we arent seeing from the diagrams.
If it's anything like the 3G model.. NO! NO! NO!!! Bad Apple!
BTW What happened to the super hip anime style "none-touch" ipod?
You can FEEL for the buttons to skip or pause or whatever. Once you touch, you've already skipped to the next song. Having to contantly put on the lock button is very annoying.
To imagine just holding this and accidently activating a million options...
I can hope this is either a decoy, or that somehow apple has figured out something we arent seeing from the diagrams.
If it's anything like the 3G model.. NO! NO! NO!!! Bad Apple!
BTW What happened to the super hip anime style "none-touch" ipod?
Abstract
Dec 9, 04:00 AM
Abstract likes this.
GGJstudios
Apr 9, 01:00 PM
It's either or... not both simultaneously.
4np
Oct 4, 08:39 AM
Any clues as of when this multifunctional devices will be presented?
lredlefsen
Sep 12, 10:32 PM
Anyone else catch Steve's closing comment "See you again real soon"? Maybe he means MWSF, or maybe... ;)
LexusLuthor
Jun 23, 11:17 AM
I will probably be at the Northridge store. Was there for the 3GS launch and the line forms just inside the mall, outside the store. There was not that big of a line at all. I was actually VERY surprised. I was probably # 20 in line and when I got out the line for preorders was not any longer than when I entered it. I just felt bad for the walk-ins. Their line was long.
See you all there. Bright and early.
See you all there. Bright and early.
Hellhammer
Apr 25, 01:56 PM
Any hard drive will work, you can format it to OS X compatible format in Disk Utility. You can create exFAT or NTFS partition for Windows if you need to use it as well.
Do you want capacity or portability? 2.5" drives require no external power supply which makes them better with laptops since they are plug&play. However, they cost a bit more and most top out at 750GB or 1TB (Seagate has 1.5TB though).
Do you want capacity or portability? 2.5" drives require no external power supply which makes them better with laptops since they are plug&play. However, they cost a bit more and most top out at 750GB or 1TB (Seagate has 1.5TB though).
spuncan
Apr 12, 05:03 PM
other then inside macgame's forum (doesnt have much and rarely visited)
there are many well regulated Forums that dont belong to clans along w/ the fact that common folk arent that welcome. So please make a Games forum in ur next forum update. As for the new forums both cool the switch over one sounds a little better just beacuse ebay seems to be very prominent and the collectables forum seems to be good enought for announcements of bids.
there are many well regulated Forums that dont belong to clans along w/ the fact that common folk arent that welcome. So please make a Games forum in ur next forum update. As for the new forums both cool the switch over one sounds a little better just beacuse ebay seems to be very prominent and the collectables forum seems to be good enought for announcements of bids.
MacRumors
Aug 7, 06:00 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com)
Microsoft has announced that it has halted development on a universal version of VirtualPC.
In a statement on Monday, Microsoft said it "has made the decision not to move forward with a Universal version of Virtual PC at this time." -- via News.com (http://news.com.com/2100-1012_3-6102930.html?part=rss&tag=6102930&subj=news)
VirtualPC has long-been the king of the hill for Virtualization on Macintosh. With the Intel transition, however, came competitive pressure from Parallels (http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/), which has since released the final version of its product, and VMWare which is showcasing a beta (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060805151513.shtml) of its solution at WWDC.
Microsoft has claimed that to port VirtualPC to Intel would be much like making VirtualPC 1.0 all over again.
Because of how closely virtualization software is tied to an operating system, Microsoft said that moving Virtual PC to the Intel-based Mac would be "similar to creating a version 1.0 release."
Digg This (http://digg.com/apple/Microsoft_Officially_Kills_Virtual_PC)
Microsoft has announced that it has halted development on a universal version of VirtualPC.
In a statement on Monday, Microsoft said it "has made the decision not to move forward with a Universal version of Virtual PC at this time." -- via News.com (http://news.com.com/2100-1012_3-6102930.html?part=rss&tag=6102930&subj=news)
VirtualPC has long-been the king of the hill for Virtualization on Macintosh. With the Intel transition, however, came competitive pressure from Parallels (http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/), which has since released the final version of its product, and VMWare which is showcasing a beta (http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2006/08/20060805151513.shtml) of its solution at WWDC.
Microsoft has claimed that to port VirtualPC to Intel would be much like making VirtualPC 1.0 all over again.
Because of how closely virtualization software is tied to an operating system, Microsoft said that moving Virtual PC to the Intel-based Mac would be "similar to creating a version 1.0 release."
Digg This (http://digg.com/apple/Microsoft_Officially_Kills_Virtual_PC)
MrSmith
Oct 12, 08:05 AM
By 'upside down' he means rotated 180 degrees, as if it was typed on a calculator display which was then viewed upside down.
I know... :rolleyes: :)
I know... :rolleyes: :)
savar
Oct 24, 11:01 PM
Ah, but YOU'RE missing the point completely. As resolutions inscrease the interface can scale up because it is resolution independent in 10.5. Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part.
Fear not sir, the WebKit team is already working on resolution independence. I'm pretty sure that some of the web specifications are being upgraded to provide resolution scalability as well. (For instance providing a choice between two resolutions for the same image on the page.) Alas, the web is such a clusterf* of randomly assorted technologies, most of which were never intended to scale to hi-res displays, so I expect the transition to be long and painful, but I trust that the Web Kit team will come up with clever ways to carefully scale up the content.
Fear not sir, the WebKit team is already working on resolution independence. I'm pretty sure that some of the web specifications are being upgraded to provide resolution scalability as well. (For instance providing a choice between two resolutions for the same image on the page.) Alas, the web is such a clusterf* of randomly assorted technologies, most of which were never intended to scale to hi-res displays, so I expect the transition to be long and painful, but I trust that the Web Kit team will come up with clever ways to carefully scale up the content.
IJ Reilly
Oct 11, 08:36 PM
Lasso? I don't get it.
Sounds good. :) What about Numbers? I pray they don't dumb it down like Pages, please!
Pages is great -- not dumbed down at all.
Sounds good. :) What about Numbers? I pray they don't dumb it down like Pages, please!
Pages is great -- not dumbed down at all.
gnasher729
Apr 20, 04:14 PM
The ipod is dying. The touch is the only one which will survive the longest. People these days just like touch screens with features packed to the rafters and the classic, nano and shuffle are falling by the wayside.
Except of course for those who want to listen to music. Touch screen and features are rather useless to me in the car. And the iPod Touch is much too big, compared to my iPod nano.
That margin is truly ridiculous. Great for stockholders but really bad for consumers. A 41% profit margin, they could sell their $1000 computers for 800 dollars and still make the industry average profit.
Has anyone ever explained the meaning of "gross margin" to you?
Except of course for those who want to listen to music. Touch screen and features are rather useless to me in the car. And the iPod Touch is much too big, compared to my iPod nano.
That margin is truly ridiculous. Great for stockholders but really bad for consumers. A 41% profit margin, they could sell their $1000 computers for 800 dollars and still make the industry average profit.
Has anyone ever explained the meaning of "gross margin" to you?
jaw04005
Jun 17, 12:46 PM
Did you not realize that was the link posted in the original post?
Not everyone wants to have to click through an obscure link just to see what the OP was talking about. :rolleyes:
Not everyone wants to have to click through an obscure link just to see what the OP was talking about. :rolleyes:
steviem
May 28, 12:23 AM
so i'll expect the westfield centre to be empty ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment